Home
Background
Statistics
Planning and Policy
State of Tamil
Interviews
Conclusion
Bibliography
Links
Discussion
Board
| |
The History of Tamil and its use in Singapore
To fully understand the state
of the Tamil language in Singapore, we must first acquire an understanding of
the language’s history in this island state. Amongst the plethora of Indian
languages, Tamil is the most widely spoken in Singapore. This arose from the
unique circumstances in which Indians settled in Singapore; the first Indians
who came to the then-British colony were mostly Southern Indians, whose
vernacular was dominantly Tamil. This ratio of Tamils in the entire Indian
community still exist today; they form about 61% of the total Indian population.
The
Tamil population was not an affluent community. This hindered Tamil education in
the early days of Singapore. Historical literature attests to the reality of the
early Indians in Singapore.
Tamil education was on
the other hand, almost non-existent in Singapore. In 1935, Tamil schools were
registered as having 166 student (see Wilson, 1978: 64) and shortly before the
outbreak of World War II, one thousand pupils were enrolled at registered
Tamil schools (see Doraisamy, 1969: 38). The Government allocation of 0.5% of
its total expenditure for education to Tamil schools illustrates their
importance of education.
Altehender-Smith,
Sherida, Language Change via Language Planning, 1990
|
History of Tamil Education Timeline
1819 - 1929
During
this period, the Indian population, like many others flocking to |
Singapore,
consisted of migrants. Setting up education was not a top |
priority
for them. The British East India Company who ruled Singapore |
from
1819 to 1834 adopted a laissez-fair attitude towards education, |
focusing
their concerns on British Malaya as a whole. This meant |
needs
of the indigenous Malay majority was considered above that |
of
transient migrant populations. The Malay language was given |
importance
as the vernacular and free elementary schooling in Malay |
was
provided by the government, together with aid for English-medium |
schools.
|
1819-33 |
No
Tamil schools. |
1834 |
First Tamil class
started by Singapore Free school. |
|
(closed in 1835 and
reopened from 1837-39) |
1839 |
Christian
missions revived Tamil education. |
|
(usually
taught Tamil with English) |
1876 |
Government
decides not to support Chinese and Tamil |
|
education. |
|
(on
grounds that English education was prefered) |
1884-7 |
Tamil
schools existed. |
|
They
had no government aid and did not survive. |
1916-24 |
1
Anglo-Tamil school was given aid. |
1930-44 |
|
This
period saw the establishment of Tamil education due to the |
following
reasons: |
|
a)The Indian population was more
settled. |
|
b)The
Roman Catholic Mission and Ramakrishna Mission |
|
established and managed Tamil
schools with relative |
|
success. |
|
c)
The Singapore Indian Association took charge of education |
|
for the Indians. |
However,
standards of Tamil education was still low due to an array |
of
reasons. This ranged from the lack of trained teachers to the general |
indifference
of the Indian population to Tamil education.
|
1928 |
Singapore
Indian Association work with Ramakrisna Mission |
|
to
assume responsibility for the Indian population. |
1928-34 |
Government
policy continued to denied grants to Chinese |
|
and
Tamil education. |
1935 |
Sir
Shenton Thomas, the governor, restored government |
|
grants
to schools regardless of medium of instruction. |
1938 |
3
out of 11 Tamil Mission schools received government |
|
assistance. |
1942-45 |
Japanese
Occupation of Singapore |
|
Many
Tamil schools closed down. |
|
Indian
Independence League got involved in the administration |
|
of
Tamil schools (used as propaganda tools for them). |
1945-58
1945 |
Post-war |
|
British
Military Administration reestablished schools. |
|
Children
were encouraged to attend English-medium |
|
schools. |
1946 |
Tamil
associations, Missions and labour unions provided |
|
Tamil
education. |
|
25
Tamil schools established. |
1948 |
State
of Emergency in Singapore and Malaya. |
|
Trade
unions disbanded and many unionist fled or |
|
were
arrested. Some had managed and taught at Tamil |
|
schools.
This, coupled with poor finance, caused schools |
|
to
close down. |
1949 |
Tamil
Education Society set up. |
|
It
aimed to help the government to revive Tamil education. |
1950 |
23
Tamil schools existed in Singapore. |
|
All
23 schools only taught at primary level. |
1956 |
Establishment
of Tamil teachers' training class at the |
|
Teachers'
Training College. |
1957 |
Department
of Indian Studies with Tamil as main language |
|
was
set up at the University of Malaya in Singapore. |
1959-68
1959 |
Start
of government Tamil schools. |
|
Schools
fully aided. |
1960 |
Establishment
of first Tamil secondary schools. |
1966 |
Memorandum
on Tamil Education. |
1967 |
Prof.
Thani Nayagam at University of Malaya brought |
|
world
attention to Tamil at the 1st International Conference |
|
on
Tamil research. |
1969-82 |
|
This
period saw the decline and end of Tamil schools in Singapore. |
Developments
in the political, social and economic environment of |
Singapore
affected the demand for Tamil education adversely. |
Bi-lingualism
was emphasised after the separation from Malaysia |
and
English education was promoted as a means of securing one's |
future
employment prospects.
|
1965 |
Separation
from Malaysia |
|
Policy
of bi-lingualism and rapid industralization with English |
|
as
the language of wider communication. |
1975 |
Enrolment
at primary one classes in Tamil-medium schools |
|
fell
to nil. |
|
NUS
Tamil Literary Society established. |
1977 |
1st
biennial seminar by NUS Tamil Literary Society - |
|
"Tamil
Language and Literature in Singapore". |
1981 |
Submission
of report on the the re-establishment of |
|
Indian
Studies at University. |
1982-86 |
Annual
Youth Seminars organised by Youth Wing of the |
|
Tamils
Representative Council |
1985 |
Last
Tamil school, the Umar Pulavar Tamil High School |
|
closes
down. |
Summary |
|
The
failure of Tamil-medium schools to survive often revolved |
around
a series of similar problems. The lack of government support |
and
that of suitable textbooks, teachers and finances led to the low |
prestige
of Tamil education and that of a proper structure for Tamil |
education
beyond that of a primary level throughout the years. |
Ultimately,
the social, poltical and economic environment of |
Singapore
was not conducive to the growth of Tamil education. |
|